Sunday, June 21, 2026

Bulletin Board Material



Bulletin Board Material

The above is a photo of the bulletin board in my office.  For years I've wanted to pin a Topps card from every year since '52 to it, but have only now finally gotten around to it.  I'm pleased with the way it came out.  My basic idea beyond one of every year, was to not have any duplicate players and keep it all to one team.  I thought about doing a card from the corresponding World Series Champion for each season, but in the end opted for keeping it all one team.  I feel like this is a better example of the changes (and similarities) in design from year to year.  I was able to pull duplicates from my collection (no breaking up sets in 3-ring binders) for most of these.  1997 through 2007 did require going on Sportlots and hunting down cards as I literally have zero cards from a lot of those seasons, but that was surprisingly painless as far as cost.  Here's a run down of who made the board.


1952 to 1955

I didn't have a lot to go with as far as duplicates from these sets.  Ed Lopat is the only big name here (check his stats, I bet you'll be surprised).  The Frank Overmire is a card I've always thought was nice looking, and ended up picking up a few of them whenever I saw them for cheap when I was building the '52 set as a result.  It may not be apparent, but I didn't actually stick the cards with the push pins.  Sure, they'll have little dents along the edge, but I'm no slabber, they'll be fine.


1956 to 1959

You can really see the thought process Topps was using in the 50's with these cards.  '58 is basically a rehash of '54, but with just the mini picture.  '59 combines '57 and '58.  It wasn't until I started focusing my collecting on vintage Topps sets, that I suddenly saw just how prominent bright colors have been to the design throughout the years.  For decades I viewed sets like '54, '58, and '75 as outliers, but with only a few exceptions, it's almost always in the design.


1960 to 1963

It took me forty years of looking at these cards to see the common thread in '60, '61, and '63, with the red and yellow at the bottom.  Now I can't unsee it.  The names on these cards should start being more recognizable.  The '63 Yogi is probably the biggest card on the board, certainly if condition wasn't a factor it would be.  This might also be my favorite four year run of Topps cards that they've ever printed.  This run represents the heart of my father's collection that survived.  As kids (around '88) my brother and I would go through his shoe box of cards and just be in awe of these.  They somehow seemed older forty years ago than they do today.  None of these were my father's cards.  As I've dove head first into vintage collecting, I've never intermingled the ones I pick up with his originals, which are somehow now far out numbered by mine.


1964 to 1967

This run of four years has never really caught my attention.  I am seeing it with some new eyes, and '64 & 67 do suddenly have a lot more pop of color I didn't always see and ''66 keeps with the red/yellow bottom stripping, so there is some new found appreciation.  Howard/Pepitone/Bouton/Ford also represent four of my all-time favorite Yankees, albeit for very different reasons.


1968 to 1972

I somehow never matched the red bubbles (at least, red in the case of Yankees, various other colors for other teams) in the lower left of '68 with the red bubbles in the uppe right of '69.  I also somehow never noticed "Yanks" as the name in the '70 set, and that was a set I spent a ton of time analyzing as it was the first vintage set build I ever completed.  Outside of Tresh, these guys may not be household names, but they all had very solid careers and deserve to be represented up here on this board as great Yankees of their era (albeit, not all Yankees Era's are created equal).


1973 to 1977

This is a great run of designs.  I don't argue with people who say '75 is the best set Topps ever printed (not my choice, but it's on my short list), and the other ones up here are all great as well.  When you focus on the pops of color on these other four designs, they suddenly look a lot less drab.  The red circle on '73, the blue piping on '74, '76 with the stripes, and '77 with the team names and pennant.  I also really like the players I was able to use for this run.  The Sparkly Lyle is a card that never really caught my eye during my '74 set build, but definitely should have.


1978 to 1981

This isn't my favorite four year run of designs, but there absolutley nothing wrong with them either, as evidenced by these four cards.  I think Topps was really in a groove here and would keep it going for another ten years before they started to over think things.  The Munson, Guidry, and Jackson may be four of my favorite Topps cards in existence, just fantastic examples of what a "baseball card" is supposed to be.


1982 to 1986

With this run of cards we've run into my era of collecting.  I know I bought cards in '83, but '84 was the first set I actually remember asking for in the grocery store (and even then it was usually Fleer at the time).  By '86 I was full on trading cards with friends.  That '86 Mattingly is one of the first cards I remember being "special" and standing out among the others.  Prior to that I think my focus was on Expos and cards with "cool" photos on the front.


1987 to 1991

This five year run perfectly captures the heart of my collecting.  I bought more packs of cards during this period than any other period.  These sets will always elicit happy memories for me.  They may not be worth the cardboard they're printed on to modern collectors, but to me they're priceless.  I may also be the only person in the world who holds this position, but you'll never convince me that 1988 Topps isn't the greatest set ever printed.  Just a perfectly executed and genuine throwback to the sets that came before it, with obvious elements of '64, '66, and '67.  Maybe Topps was feeling nostalgic heading into their 40th, because all of these designs borrow heavily from ones that came before (something I wish Topps would do more of today).

1992 to 1995

Thanks a lot Upper Deck, and misguided kids who bought it (my brother and I bought a crazy amount of Upper Deck from '89-'91).  This is the start of Topps messing with the program that had worked perfectly well for forty years, wasn't broken, and didn't need to be fixed.  1992 saw the white backs with color photos of the stadiums, '93 introduced gloss to the backs, and for some reason Topps decided their bubble gum cards required foil stamping in 1995 and have never looked back.  By 1995 I wasn't really buying cards any more.  I would pick up a few packs every year until '97, just to see the designs, but I had moved on to other interest for the most part.


1996 to 2000

I have deep seeded resentment towards the 1996 and 1997 Topps sets.  I actually kind of like the '97 design (a lot if I'm being honest), but these two sets still earn my disdain.  The problem being one of omission.  There is no Tim Wallach in either sets unusually small checklists.  There definitely should be based on precedent, but there isn't.  Other companies at the time were still including Wallach, but for some reason Topps didn't think he warranted inclusion with his 2000 hits and 17 years worth of stats to fill up the backs with.  I don't know what Topps was thinking at the time, and I wasn't buying cards, but I find this to be a rather forgettable period in the Topps timeline.


2001 to 2005

I definitely never bought a single pack from any one of these sets.  They're not bad looking sets.  I like the return of the second photo in 2003, and I find the 2002 bronze border to a subtle ode to '87 and '62 (even if no one else does).  2004 and 2005 would be so much better looking if the names at the top were just matte colors instead of hard to read foil stamping.


2006 to 2009

2008 represents my return to card collecting.  It was just supposed to be something to break the monotony of studing for the bar exam, but now 18 years later I'm still as deep as I ever was into the hobby.  Or at least, my 1988 version of the hobby that doesn't involve slabs or willie wonka golden ticket cards.  This is a nice little run of big name Yankees, maybe the best four year run on my board.


2010 -2014

I didn't like these sets much when they came out, and they haven't grown on me any since then.  Too much white, too much foil, not enough personality.


2015 to 2019

I appreciate Topps making an effort to take some design risk during this run of sets.  They don't all hit (2016 I find particularly terrible), but a few of them do and I'd much prefer Topps take a risk that doesn't work out with a design, then pump out another generic boring set.


2020 to 2023

2023 has really grown on me as a set.  I actually think it's the start of a nice little run that Topps has carried into 2026.  2020 on the other hand may be my least favorite design on this board.  I think Luke Voit, the most anonomous Yankee to ever lead the American League in home runs, is an apt choice to represent the set.


2024 to 2026

2024 is in my opinion, the best Topps design of the last 15 years.  2025 and 2026 are fine as well.  I think were due for a colorful set in 2027, but Topps may have other ideas.  In any event, I've got room for seven more sets before I run out of space.  This whole exercise has made me feel very old.











Wednesday, June 10, 2026

Ebay Pickup


I picked up this lot of 107 cards on eBay at my self-imposed standard of less than 10 cents a card shipped.  The listing made a big deal about there not being any duplicates, which isn't a selling point for me.  In a bit of a statistical anonmoloy, three different cards ('94 Score, '94 Upper Deck, and '95 Topps) all landed on exactly 100 copies with the addition of this lot.  This lot was pretty straight forward, a near perfectly cut '88 Fleer Box Bottom, and the two '91 Baseball Card Magazine inserts were the highlights.

Updated Totals:

Monday, June 8, 2026

McKinney, TX


These 75 cards were sent by regular contributor Nick, of McKinney, Texas.  He sent them way back in March, or February, or I don't know when.  It's been awhile.  There's been some re-organizing going on in my home for awhile now, related to having added a newborn (or almost a year old toddler now) into the mix last summer.  The result being, my card room has become more of a storage closet for what ever needs stowing.  To the point it's hard to get in and out, and more or less impossible to sort and organize anything.  Only recently have I had a chance to start moving outgrown baby items and whatever else was shoved in there to long term storage, the basement, garage, trash or good will.  So now I can (sort of) start the process of clearing a little space to see what has been piling up on the shelves and desk as far as cards.

Thanks for the cards Nick!

Updated Totals:




Tuesday, June 2, 2026

Peoria, IL


These 19 cards were sent by Tom with the Saints Prison Ministry out of Peoria, IL.  Tom has been a regular contributor for over a decade now, having first sent cards way back in 2014.  This batch was heavy on 1987 Donruss.  That's a card that has grown on me over the years.  I remember not being a fan of the photo when I first pulled the card from a pack back in '87, and not thinking much of it for a long time after that.  But somewhere along the way over the last 40 years and 564 additional copies, I've come to really like it.

As always, thanks for the cards Tom!

Updated Totals:


You can learn more about the Saints Prison Ministry by clicking the link above or the image below:




Monday, April 20, 2026

Miscellaneous Pickups

I've been unusually active on Sportlots lately.  I know I said I wasn't going to buy random cards this year, and instead focus on saving for a '53 Mays, but my hand was forced.  One of the perks of being a season ticket holder to the Albuquerque Isotopes, is that early in the year they put on a meet and greet with all (or most of, sans a few curmudgeons) of all of the players.  So I made a point to track down cards for as many of the guys as I could this year, which for the most part was ones I didn't have from random Bowman and Topps Debut sets (where do you even buy packs of these?).  Old habits die hard, and I couldn't just order 3 cards from a seller, without maxing out the shipping price point with a few Wallach's.  That's where most of the 80 cards above came from.

The best cards of the bunch, pictured again below, were two random eBay purchases.  These sort of oddballs aren't all that hard to find, but usually sellers want about $5 a pop for them.  The Rancho Cucamonga showed up for a buck shipped, and the lot of Stuarts was less than a buck a card, so I pulled the trigger.  It's actually the first Ranco Cucamonga card I've added since 2013.  So maybe it's a little more rare than I thought it was.

Updated Totals:


Monday, April 13, 2026

2011 1992 Bowman #557 USA Baseball Alumni "No Foil Error"



Card Review: N/A (I gave the non-error a 4.5)

I came across this on eBay recently.  This an error (that's what we used to call variants back when they were unintentional) printing of the 1992 Bowman card.  The correctly printed version has gold foil around the edges of the card.  This one is just plain card stock, like the rest of the 1992 Bowman set.

I prefer the standard '92 Bowman to these USA Gold Foil subset cards, but I don't mind the foil as a limited run in the set.  So I have mixed feelings about this card.  That said, it's fun to come across new Wallach's from that era some 30 years after they were produced.  I'm not sure how rare these are or if the other USA cards also have non-foil versions floating around.  I also haven't checked to see if the gold foil is something that can just be rubbed off.  If it's the case, then this post will be getting a big re-write and this card will just get tallied with the others as a low grade copy.

Here's a look at the 1992 Bowman for a refresher:

   

Number of this card in my collection: 1

Monday, April 6, 2026

2025 Topps Shoebox Treasures #15A "Wood Stock" #/5

 

Card Review: 9.4

I like this non-autograph version better than the autographed version (sharpie marks don't belong on baseball cards).  These wood variants, while certainly a goofy gimmick, are a very cool goofy gimmick.  They sort of have the feel of those old wooden airplanes that you could buy and then assemble.  The back of the card feels like a normal card, but the front is very much thin wood.  Snapping one of these in half wouldn't take much pressure, though the paper back would likely hold it all together.  Given that there are only 5 of them, I'm not willing to spend the $5 to $20 bucks the cheaper ones demand to find out.

If Topps is going to continue to insist on stuffing their hard to find, overpriced packs with all sorts of junk that isn't part of the set, then I fully support them getting weird with it.  I'd like to see them try to print on gum.  A card sized slab of gum with a card, even if monotone, printed on the front that is fully edible.  Different flavors can be printed in different numbers.

I also like the idea of intentionally embracing errors, but curated.  Print off centered cards, but go ahead and slap x/# on the back, with the more off-centered ones being more scarce, or start slapping wax stains on cards.  Call them "variants" and individually number them.  I'm just sick of refractors, gold borders, and other similar things.  As far as non variants, would modern collectors like cards that were nothing more than offers to mail in $10 for your favorite teams painters cap if they were individually numbered?  Yellow ones could be common, with green ones being out of 100 and red ones out of 10?  Then do the same thing with offers to win a trip to the All-Star Game or something.  I wouldn't be as annoyed with inserts like those.

Number of this card in my collection: 1




Friday, March 27, 2026

2025 Topps Shoebox Treasures #15A "Vintage Stock" #/10

Card Review: 9.3

Much like the "Vintage Stock Auto" variation of this card, I have hard time interpreting this card as being "vintage stock."  I guess the feel is a little less glossy than the current Topps cards, but this is a lot closer in look and feel to a 1993 Topps than it is a 1963 Topps.  In any event, it's not going to be an issue for too many collectors as there are only "ten" of these (unless you count the other ten they slapped an autograph sticker on) floating around out there.  I prefer this normal variant over the autographed one, but there both pretty nice cards.

A few the eBay sellers seem to have accepted that I can in fact live without all of these as the prices on these has fallen off a cliff in recent weeks.  That's what led to me recently adding this, and a few other of the remaining variants I don't have yet.

Number of this card in my collection: 1



Tuesday, March 24, 2026

Chasing 2,085

                                

Over 23,000 people have played Major League Baseball, give or take a few, depending on what year you start.  Of those 23,000 people, a mere 251 of them have reached the career milestone of 2,085 hits.  That's 0.01%.  There are currently four active players in Major League Baseball who have reached the vaunted milestone of 2,085 career hits.  It's no small feat.  A player needs to average a 140 hits a season for 15 years to reach the rarified air of 2,085 hits.  

140 hits a year may not appear to be all that impressive of a mark on first blush.  Yet last season, only 68 players reached the number.  Look deeper, and you'll find that only 14 players have reached the number in each of the last four seasons, those being; Bobby Witt, Bryan Reynolds, Francisco Lindor, Freddie Freeman, Jose Ramirez, Luis Arraez, Manny Machado, Matt Olson, Rafael Devers, Shohei Ohtani, Trea Turner, Vladimir Guerrero, and Yandy Diaz.  Again, 2,085 demands 140 hits for 15 seasons.  It's an incredible mark.

You may have heard of a few of these players below.  They all have something in common.  They're all Hall of Famers who came up short in their chase for 2,085 hits.  It's a long list, full of household names, but here are few of the legends it includes: Johnny Bench, Andruw Jones, Hank Greenberg, Jackie Robinson, Hack Wilson and Gil Hodges.

Of course, 2,085 hits doesn't assure a player a place in Cooperstown.  Some notable players to have reached the milestone and not receive a plaque include; Omar Vizquel, Al Oliver, Rusty Stuab, Bill Buckner, Buddy Bell, Torii Hunter, Mark Grace, Lou Whitaker, Paul Konerko, Bernie Williams, Willie McGee, Willie Randolph, Will Clark, Don Mattingly, and Tim Wallach.

Perhaps you have heard of a few of them.  

Below is a look at the active players who have reached the club, and the active hit leaders who are nearest to reaching it, with a breakdown of their prospects to join the club.


The 2,085 Hits Club




Freddie Freeman 2,431

Hits in 2025: 164
Average over the Last Four: 182

Will He get there: Yes, of course he's there already.  I don't think he ends up reaching 3,000, but he'll have a look at it, and even if he doesn't, there will be plenty of other stuff to put on his plaque in Cooperstown.

Age: 36












Jose Altuve 2,388
Age: 35
Hits in 2025: 156
Average over the Last Four: 153

Will He get there: Yes. If Altuve can stay on the field until age 40, he'll have a look at 3,000.  I'll be rooting against "Mr. Don't tear my jersey off because I'm cheating," but he'll make a run at it if he stays healthy.

















Andrew McCutchen 2,266
Age: 39
Hits in 2025: 114
Average over the Last Four: 110

Will He get there: Already there.  At 39 and entering his 18th season, I think it's more likely McCtuchen retires with 2,266 hits than finds himself in a starting lineup on opening day.  Hopefully he finds his way to Cooperstown, he'd have my vote.















Paul Goldschmidt 2,190
Hits in 2025: 134
Average over the Last Four: 155
Age: 38

Will He get there: Already there.  Pauls's hit totals have dropped gradually each of the last four seasons, going 178, 159, 147, to 134 last season. Who knows how long he'll keep playing, but 3,000 won't be in the cards, but Cooperstown might be.





Active Players Chasing 2,085



Manny Machado 2,069
Age: 33
Hits in 2025: 169
Average over the Last Four: 161

Will He get there: Yes, likely early this season.  Machado may have an outside chance at 3,000 if he can keep being productive for another another six to seven years, but time may have other ideas.
















Nolan Arenado 1,921
Age: 34
Hits in 2025: 95
Average over the Last Four: 141

Will He get there: Nolan should reach 2,085 in 2026 if he plays a full season.  A run at 3,000 isn't in his future, but 2,085 is nothing to feel bad about.



















Carlos Santana 1,880
Hits in 2025: 91
Age: 39
Average over the Last Four: 109

Will He get there: I don't think he makes it.  Carlos is 39 years old and has somehow played for 7 teams in the last four years.  I'm not sure he'll play for any in 2026, but even if he does, I don't think there are another 205 hits left in his bat.  





Xander Bogaers 1,822

Age: 33
Hits in 2025: 129
Average over the Last Four: 146

Will He get there: Bogaerts should reach 2,085, but the dip in his numbers the last two seasons is cause for slight concern.  I think he gets there, but it'll be closer than I would have thought not too long ago.













Bryce Harper 1,801

Age: 33
Hits in 2025: 131
Average over the Last Four: 132

Will He get there: Harper, a two-time MVP, was right on his four year average with 131 hits in 2025.  He'll reach 2,085 at age 35 if he can maintain that pace.  He's safe bet to do so, and to reach the Hall of Fame after that.  He'd have to play into his 40's to reach 3,000 hits at his current pace, which seems very unlikely.





DJ LeMahieu 1,772

Age: 37
Hits in 2025: 34
Average over the Last Four: 80

Will He get there: No. The two time batting champion has averaged just 80 hits the last four years, and would need to play another three seasons to reach 2,085 at that clip.  I wouldn't bet on it.






Mookie Betts 1,767

Age: 33
Hits in 2025: 152
Average over the Last Four: 154

Will He get there: Yes.  At 33 Betts is already an MVP and 8x All-Star.  With three more full seasons, 2,085 hits seems like a certainty for Betts, and he could easily do it in under two.  3,000 seems like a bridge too far, so Betts will just have to settle for a plaque in Cooperstown.





Mike Trout 1,754

Age: 34
Hits in 2025: 106
Average over the Last Four: 84

Will He get there: Probably not.  Trout, who is 33, has averaged just 84 hits a season over the last four years.  Somehow that's an improvement, as he's only averaged 72 over the last 6 seasons.  If he can't stay on the field, 2,085 is going to prove too high a number for Trout to reach.  Should he fail to do so, he'll be an interesting case for Cooperstown.  He has Kirby Puckett type numbers, but without the World Series Rings.  The Hall of Fame is for stars that we see shining brightly every night for 15-20 years, not comets that streak brightly across them for just a few.  







Nick Castellanos 1,742

Age: 34
Hits in 2025: 137
Average over the Last Four: 150

Will He get there: It's going to be close.  Nick is going to need three more healthy, productive seasons, and father time starts to warm up in the bullpen for most guys when they reach around 34 or so years old.















Christian Yelich 1,741
Age: 34
Hits in 2025: 151
Average over the Last Four: 134

Will He get there: Yes. The 34 year old former MVP had a nice bounce back season in 2025 with 151 hits, 29 homers, and driving in 103 runs.  Yelich is going to be a guy somebody wants in their lineup down the road even if his numbers drop off some.  I think he'll be given the time and at-bats to reach 2,085 hits.




Salvador Perez 1,712

Age: 35
Hits in 2025: 141
Average over the Last Four: 138

Will He get there: Yes.  Perez is a 9x All-Star, has 5 Gold Gloves, and 5 Silver Sluggers and showing few signs of slowing down at 35.  If he has three more seasons in him, he should reach 2,085.  The World Series Champion would have my vote for Cooperstown even if he came up short.












Jose Ramirez 1,668

Age: 33
Hits in 2025: 168
Average over the Last Four: 170

Will He get there: Yes. A model of consistency, Ramirez doesn't appear to be slowing down. He'll hit 2,085 in 2028 at age 35 barring injury.














Francisco Lindor 1,664

Age: 32
Hits in 2025: 172
Average over the Last Four: 166
Will He get there: Yes. 

Lindor is the youngest player on this list.  He's averaged 166 hits a season the last four years and posted his highest season total since 2018 last year.  He should reach 2,085 in 2027 or 2028 if he can stay on the field.  If he can play, and produce, until he's 40 (no small task), he may flirt with 3,000 hits.







Starling Marte 1,639

Age: 37
Hits in 2025: 79
Average over the Last Four: 96

Will He get there: No. Marte's career appears to be winding down at age 37.  He hasn't logged a 100+ hits in a season since 2022, and hasn't played in more than 100 games since then either.













Marcell Ozuna 1,627

Age: 35
Hits in 2025: 113
Average over the Last Four: 137

Will He get there: No. The 35 year old Ozuna has a lot of work to do before to get to 2,085, and I just don't see another 450+ hits in his bat.




Giancarlo Stanton 1,619
Age: 36
Hits in 2025: 68
Average over the Last Four: 80

Will He get there: No. Stanton is 36 years old and only averaging 80 hits a season the last four years.  He may hang around for a few more years and be a scary out for pitchers as he tracks down 500 homers, but 2,085 hits isn't going to happen for him.
















Justin Turner 1,606
Age: 41
Hits in 2025: 37
Average over the Last Four: 69

Will He get there: No. I'd call it a safe bet that this two-time All-Star isn't on a roster come opening day.














Marcus Semien 1,613

Age: 35
Hits in 2025: 108
Average over the Last Four: 153

Will He get there: No, but it'll be close.  Semien led the AL in hits in 2023 with 185.  But he's dropped off significantly since then.  Father time is undefeated, and works quickly once he shows up.







Jason Heyward 1,575

Age: 36
Hits in 2025: 15
Average over the Last Four: 45

Will He get there: No. I don't know if Heyward has already played his last game in the majors, but I do know that he isn't going to reach 2,085.  














Trea Turner 1,531

Age: 32 
Hits in 2025: 179
Average over the Last Four: 171

Will He get there: Yes.  Turner is still three full, productive seasons away from 2,085.  If he stays healthy, that shouldn't be an issue for him.  How much will he pass it by?  A lot.  Will he reach 3,000?  No.  Trea would need to average 188 hits a year over the next 8 seasons to reach 3,000 at age 40.  Not going to happen.