Tuesday, June 2, 2026
Peoria, IL
Monday, April 20, 2026
Miscellaneous Pickups
I've been unusually active on Sportlots lately. I know I said I wasn't going to buy random cards this year, and instead focus on saving for a '53 Mays, but my hand was forced. One of the perks of being a season ticket holder to the Albuquerque Isotopes, is that early in the year they put on a meet and greet with all (or most of, sans a few curmudgeons) of all of the players. So I made a point to track down cards for as many of the guys as I could this year, which for the most part was ones I didn't have from random Bowman and Topps Debut sets (where do you even buy packs of these?). Old habits die hard, and I couldn't just order 3 cards from a seller, without maxing out the shipping price point with a few Wallach's. That's where most of the 80 cards above came from.
The best cards of the bunch, pictured again below, were two random eBay purchases. These sort of oddballs aren't all that hard to find, but usually sellers want about $5 a pop for them. The Rancho Cucamonga showed up for a buck shipped, and the lot of Stuarts was less than a buck a card, so I pulled the trigger. It's actually the first Ranco Cucamonga card I've added since 2013. So maybe it's a little more rare than I thought it was.
Updated Totals:
Monday, April 13, 2026
2011 1992 Bowman #557 USA Baseball Alumni "No Foil Error"

.jpeg)
Card Review: N/A (I gave the non-error a 4.5)
I came across this on eBay recently. This an error (that's what we used to call variants back when they were unintentional) printing of the 1992 Bowman card. The correctly printed version has gold foil around the edges of the card. This one is just plain card stock, like the rest of the 1992 Bowman set.
I prefer the standard '92 Bowman to these USA Gold Foil subset cards, but I don't mind the foil as a limited run in the set. So I have mixed feelings about this card. That said, it's fun to come across new Wallach's from that era some 30 years after they were produced. I'm not sure how rare these are or if the other USA cards also have non-foil versions floating around. I also haven't checked to see if the gold foil is something that can just be rubbed off. If it's the case, then this post will be getting a big re-write and this card will just get tallied with the others as a low grade copy.
Here's a look at the 1992 Bowman for a refresher:
Number of this card in my collection: 1
Monday, April 6, 2026
2025 Topps Shoebox Treasures #15A "Wood Stock" #/5
Card Review: 9.4
I like this non-autograph version better than the autographed version (sharpie marks don't belong on baseball cards). These wood variants, while certainly a goofy gimmick, are a very cool goofy gimmick. They sort of have the feel of those old wooden airplanes that you could buy and then assemble. The back of the card feels like a normal card, but the front is very much thin wood. Snapping one of these in half wouldn't take much pressure, though the paper back would likely hold it all together. Given that there are only 5 of them, I'm not willing to spend the $5 to $20 bucks the cheaper ones demand to find out.
If Topps is going to continue to insist on stuffing their hard to find, overpriced packs with all sorts of junk that isn't part of the set, then I fully support them getting weird with it. I'd like to see them try to print on gum. A card sized slab of gum with a card, even if monotone, printed on the front that is fully edible. Different flavors can be printed in different numbers.
I also like the idea of intentionally embracing errors, but curated. Print off centered cards, but go ahead and slap x/# on the back, with the more off-centered ones being more scarce, or start slapping wax stains on cards. Call them "variants" and individually number them. I'm just sick of refractors, gold borders, and other similar things. As far as non variants, would modern collectors like cards that were nothing more than offers to mail in $10 for your favorite teams painters cap if they were individually numbered? Yellow ones could be common, with green ones being out of 100 and red ones out of 10? Then do the same thing with offers to win a trip to the All-Star Game or something. I wouldn't be as annoyed with inserts like those.
Number of this card in my collection: 1
Friday, March 27, 2026
2025 Topps Shoebox Treasures #15A "Vintage Stock" #/10
Tuesday, March 24, 2026
Chasing 2,085
Over 23,000 people have played Major League Baseball, give or take a few, depending on what year you start. Of those 23,000 people, a mere 251 of them have reached the career milestone of 2,085 hits. That's 0.01%. There are currently four active players in Major League Baseball who have reached the vaunted milestone of 2,085 career hits. It's no small feat. A player needs to average a 140 hits a season for 15 years to reach the rarified air of 2,085 hits.
140 hits a year may not appear to be all that impressive of a mark on first blush. Yet last season, only 68 players reached the number. Look deeper, and you'll find that only 14 players have reached the number in each of the last four seasons, those being; Bobby Witt, Bryan Reynolds, Francisco Lindor, Freddie Freeman, Jose Ramirez, Luis Arraez, Manny Machado, Matt Olson, Rafael Devers, Shohei Ohtani, Trea Turner, Vladimir Guerrero, and Yandy Diaz. Again, 2,085 demands 140 hits for 15 seasons. It's an incredible mark.
You may have heard of a few of these players below. They all have something in common. They're all Hall of Famers who came up short in their chase for 2,085 hits. It's a long list, full of household names, but here are few of the legends it includes: Johnny Bench, Andruw Jones, Hank Greenberg, Jackie Robinson, Hack Wilson and Gil Hodges.
Of course, 2,085 hits doesn't assure a player a place in Cooperstown. Some notable players to have reached the milestone and not receive a plaque include; Omar Vizquel, Al Oliver, Rusty Stuab, Bill Buckner, Buddy Bell, Torii Hunter, Mark Grace, Lou Whitaker, Paul Konerko, Bernie Williams, Willie McGee, Willie Randolph, Will Clark, Don Mattingly, and Tim Wallach.The 2,085 Hits Club
Freddie Freeman 2,431
Hits in 2025: 164
Average over the Last Four: 182
Will He get there: Yes, of course he's there already. I don't think he ends up reaching 3,000, but he'll have a look at it, and even if he doesn't, there will be plenty of other stuff to put on his plaque in Cooperstown.
Will He get there: Yes. If Altuve can stay on the field until age 40, he'll have a look at 3,000. I'll be rooting against "Mr. Don't tear my jersey off because I'm cheating," but he'll make a run at it if he stays healthy.
Will He get there: Already there. At 39 and entering his 18th season, I think it's more likely McCtuchen retires with 2,266 hits than finds himself in a starting lineup on opening day. Hopefully he finds his way to Cooperstown, he'd have my vote.
Average over the Last Four: 155
Active Players Chasing 2,085
Age: 33
Will He get there: Yes, likely early this season. Machado may have an outside chance at 3,000 if he can keep being productive for another another six to seven years, but time may have other ideas.
Hits in 2025: 95
Xander Bogaers 1,822
Hits in 2025: 129
Bryce Harper 1,801
Hits in 2025: 131
DJ LeMahieu 1,772
Hits in 2025: 34
Mookie Betts 1,767
Mike Trout 1,754
Nick Castellanos 1,742
Age: 34
Salvador Perez 1,712
Jose Ramirez 1,668
Francisco Lindor 1,664
Lindor is the youngest player on this list. He's averaged 166 hits a season the last four years and posted his highest season total since 2018 last year. He should reach 2,085 in 2027 or 2028 if he can stay on the field. If he can play, and produce, until he's 40 (no small task), he may flirt with 3,000 hits.
Starling Marte 1,639
Marcell Ozuna 1,627
Marcus Semien 1,613
Jason Heyward 1,575
Trea Turner 1,531
Monday, March 23, 2026
2025 Topps Shoebox Treasures #15 "Black & White" #/75
Card Review: 5.7
This is yet another of the endless variations of the excellent 2025 Topps Shoebox Treasures card, and like all the other variations, it's not as nice as the original. This one is actually one of the worst. I like it a little better than the "Sepia" variation, but not much. At the end of the day, and this isn't unique to this set (which I actually like as a set quite a bit), I'm just left confused and asking "why?"
Why does anyone need all these endless variations and inserts, and what becomes of them? I opened two fat packs of 2026 Topps this year, and probably pulled cards from 9 different insert sets. Are people actually collecting them as sets? As for the variations, I'm the first to admit I'm a little weird when it comes to player collecting, but are there really that many of us out there? In another 10 years is a 2021 Topps Garrett Hampson sparkle variation of his base card numbered out of 5 going to be more in demand than just his regular base card? I doubt it. It's all just trash, regardless of how clunky and impenetrable the top loader with a number on top you store it in is. On the other hand, there will probably still be a few people building the 2021 set who need the Hampson. My point is, who asked for this? Just give me some gum to smack while I sort my pile of new cards sequentially by the number on the back.
Number of this card in my collection: 1
Thursday, January 29, 2026
2026 Collecting Goals
I'm getting this in just before the end of the month, so I think it still counts as the "New Year" season, and falls in the acceptable window for these sort of post.
The card above is a picture of a 1953 Topps #244. It depicts Willie Mays of the New York Giants. I'm keeping things simple this year in 2026. Obtaining that card is my goal. It's topped my list of "Ten Most Wanted Cards" every year since 2019, and every year I've failed to make an effort to pick one up, instead going scatter shot for other various cards from 1954-59 Topps sets. I believe I could snatch a well traveled copy of this card for under $900, which is probably more than double of what I spent all of last year on various vintage singles, but not grounds for a divorce if it's the only card I buy in 2026. It's still a hefty price tag. It would be almost triple the most I've ever paid for a card (a '53 Mantle well before covid exploded prices) and nearly four times what I paid for a '52 Mays about 10 years ago. I don't care, I want this card, and it's the last one I need to complete the 1953 set, which I would regard as the single biggest personal collecting accomplishment of my life.
Will it happen? Based on last years stated goals and what I actually did, probably not. I earned a solid "F" grade for my 2025 collecting. Here's a quick recap of my stated goals and how I did:
Thanks for reading. Hope you have a great year.




.jpeg)

.jpeg)

.jpeg)