Showing posts with label 1991. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1991. Show all posts

Thursday, July 13, 2017

1991 Panini French Stickers #141


Card Review: 8.5  It's a rare occasion that I discover a "new" Tim Wallach card from this era, especially one from a somewhat prominent manufacturer such as Panini.  I did a double take when this card (or sticker) showed up on my eBay feed.  I already had the 1991 Panini, and it's Canadian counterpart.  Additionally, I had double checked, and cross checked, and compared all of the online data bases and checklist multiple times over the years making sure I had everything, or was at least aware of what I didn't have.  Trust me, I've been very thorough.  (It is now showing up on Beckett)

So I went back and double checked my "Most Wanted List," and it all came back to me.  At one point I did have this card listed on my list.  And I remembered that I had been informed by multiple sources that the "French" version was the same was the U.S. version, the "Top 15" was the only unique foreign variation.  Well, those sources proved wrong.  I forgive them, and am happy to add one more unique Wallach to my collection.  It is a bit surprising that in now nearly two decades of eBay use that I never saw this card, but I guess stranger things have happened.

This is the same photo as the U.S. version, but with much tighter cropping.  It's also significantly larger.  Of the three 1991 Panini efforts, this one is my favorite.  This would have made for a nice 1991 Topps or Fleer card.  As it is, it's one of the better Wallach stickers to be found.

          
             ('91 Panini, not to scale)

Number of this card in my collection: 1
2018 update: n/a
2019 update: n/a
2020 update: n/a
2021 update: n/a
2022 update: n/a
2023 update: 2




Thursday, June 27, 2013

1991 Homerun Kings #18







































Card Review: 2.5  This is the sticker to go with the 1991 Homerun Kings page. I'm 99% certain this is from the same at-bat (probably same swing) as the photo used on the 1991 Red Foley Sticker.  It took me a minute to be sure it wasn't the same photo, but by looking at the Expos logo on the front of the jersey it's clear they're different.

The backs are also very similar, which leads me to conclude that "Homerun Kings" and "Red Foley" were both made by the same company.  Or they both used the same company to produce their stickers and buy photos from.

Number of this card in my collection: 1

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

1991 Red Foley Sticker


           

Card Review: 1.5  This is still way too small and flimsy for my liking, but blown up like it is on the left, it's actually not that bad of a picture.  It would have made for a nice card.  As it is, it's just a tiny sticker.

This was one of the more difficult "cards" for me to track down.  I thought I had it safely secured in my collection for years.  Then I ordered the 1990 Red Foley Sticker.  What showed up in my mailbox was the sticker I had for years been calling a 1991 Red Foley Sticker.  My first thought was, "stupid Red Foley using the same photo 2 years in a row."  Then it occurred to me, that hey, maybe nobody cares enough about these things to really figure out which year is which.  Some online research revealed that both the '90 & '91 Wallach Stickers were #99, but the rest of the set checklist were not identical.  Which led me to believe that it was a mistake by one of the sellers.

I couldn't find any pictures to verify if Red Foley used different photos for the two sets.  I used to be able to have pretty good success with google image search, but now it's dominated with results from this blog.  What I ultimately found was an uncut sheet of '91 Red Foley Stickers on ebay.  It didn't include Wallach in the description but I could make this out in the picture.  So armed with that information, I took chance and ordered one blind from a different card dealer and this is what arrived.

I also went ahead and let COMC.com know that they had the wrong picture up for this sticker.  They actually replied and politely said they would take care of it.   I'm willing to be they hadn't received many complaints prior to mine.


Number of this card in my collection: 1
2014 update: n/a
2015 update: n/a
2016 update: n/a
2017 update: n/a
2018 update: 6
2019 update: n/a

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

1991 Holsum Disk #3


Card Review: N/A  I don't claim to be an expert on baseball cards.  I've bought a lot of them over the years, but I don't think of myself as any sort of an authority figure on the subject.  As such, as my Wallach collection has grown, I've turned to online databases to figure out what Wallach cards may still be out there that I don't even have one of.

There are several of these databases, and for the most part they're the same.  They're all the same for Wallach give or take one or two cards, and they can't seem to agree what year the Alaska Gold Panners set was from.  In any event, they're a useful tool for me.  My pet peeve is they all have a very loose definition of what a "card" is.  I don't consider this to be a "card."  I can see the argument, it's cardboard, numbered, and has stats, but it's not really a baseball card.  Other stuff isn't even close.  For instance, they list postcards, and 8x10 photo sheets, and things of that nature.  And because it's on there, I feel an obligation to track it down.

None that is the fault of this Holsum disk.  I actually really like it for some reason.  I'm pretty sure these came inserted in loafs of bread that were sold in Canadian grocery stores.  I could be wrong.

Number of this "card" in my collection: 1

Thursday, May 16, 2013

1991 Fleer Ultra #210

Card Review: 7.5  I remember feeling a little bit sorry for Fleer in 1991.  It was first year they put out this "Ultra" set, which was an obvious response to the "premium" cards being put out by Upper Deck.  I'm no fan of these "premium" cards (I like my cards packed in wax, with raw cardboard backs and gum), but I still felt a little bad for Fleer.  In a vacuum this is pretty nice card.  But Topps also put out a "premium" set in '91 for the first time, and their Stadium Club set absolutely blew this and everything else out of the water.  Did Fleer know this would be the case?  I'm sure they knew Topps (and everyone else) was going to be putting out "premium" card sets, but did they have any idea just how much nicer Topps would be?  In any event, Fleer upped their ante in future editions of Ultra, and baseball cards as they had been known for the previous half-century more or less ceased to exists.


Number of this card in my collection: 22
2013 update: 27
2014 update: 40
2015 update: 61
2016 update: 67
2017 update: 72
2018 update: 83
2019 update: 92
2020 update: 100
2021 update: 102
2022 update: 108
2023 update: 121
2024 update: 126
2025 update: 141
2026 update: 143




Wednesday, February 27, 2013

1991 Topps Micro #220
























Card Review: 2.1  This card is even smaller than the Cracker Jack version.  There is no shortage of variations for the '91 Topps card.  The base, Tiffany, OPC, Desert Storm, cracker jack and this one.  Not sure we really needed two tiny editions.

Number of this card in my collection: 1
2013 update: 3
2014 update: 5
2015 update: n/a
2016 update: n/a
2017 update: n/a
2018 update: n/a
2019 update: 6


Saturday, January 26, 2013

1991 Petro-Canada Stand-up #10



Card Review: N/A  I'm not grading this as a card, but I'll count it towards the total.  It's "cardness" is kind of a gray area for me.  Everything you see above is the same item.  When stored it looks kind of like a card, as seen in the bottom two images.  But when you open it up, there are two flaps inside.  The idea is you pop-out the player, stand up the back ground, and it makes a little diorama type thing.  Had I had this when I was ten, it would have found a very nice spot in in my room.  Today, it's a little too cheap looking to find a spot in my office.

Number of this "card" in my collection: 1
2015 update: 3
2016 update: n/a
2017 update: n/a
2018 update: n/a
2019 update: n/a
2020 update: n/a
2021 update: n/a
2022 update: 4

*Updated*
I picked up a 2nd copy of these from a reader in Ottawa, and it was already punched out, so here are some pics of it in full display:




Monday, December 17, 2012

1991 Cracker Jack un-cut "sheet"















Card Review: Incomplete  I'm not calling this a "card" even though a feels a lot more like a card than the regular Cracker Jack card.  While I'm not calling this a card, I still like it a lot, and the player selection is fantastic.  I always viewed Kelly Gruber as the slightly inferior American League Tim Wallach.  Like Wallach, he was a great player who didn't get nearly the attention he deserved because he played in Canada.  Howard Johnson on the other hand, was not one of my favorites.  He did however provided me with a nice example to use in arguments as to the levels Super Star status Wallach would have reached  had he played in New York.  DeShields was/is/remains one of my personal favorites.


Thursday, October 18, 2012

1991 BB Card Price Guide Monthly #36















Card Review: 8.4  Up until about a minute ago I had always assumed this card was put out by the same magazine that did this 1966 version.  But the copyright information is completely different.  Guess there were multiple off-brand price guides putting out knock-off thin stock cards back in 1991.  Can't say I'm surprised.  This card is also a useful tool, as for quick reference people could note that their '88 Score Wallach was worth 5 cents.

Number of this card in my collection: 1
2015 update: 2
2016 update: n/a
2017 update: n/a
2018 update: n/a
2019 update: 3
2020 update: n/a
2021 update: n/a
2022 update: n/a
2023 update: n/a
2024 update: n/a
2025 update: n/a
2026 update: 4


Wednesday, October 17, 2012

1991 Score Super Stars #58




















Card Review: 1.9  For reasons I can't rationally explain, I've always despised this card design.  On it's face, there's nothing horrible about it.  It's not wild, or overly crazy in any way.  It's about as basic as you can get.  But it just misses.  I think a few tiny changes would have made all the difference.  For one, get rid of the green.  If the Expos logo on the front were outlined in yellow, it would completely change the tone of this card.  I'd also have done the names differently.  Keep with the red/blue theme, maybe by bringing the blue box up higher and doing the letters in red or white.

As to what this set is/was, I don't really know.  I have no idea how these cards were sold.  I'm guessing as some sort of boxed set.  I don't remember ever seeing one until years later when eBay became a thing and I saw this Wallach for the first time.  It has the look of something that you would have seen in a clear plastic casing, hanging on a rack in a store, similar to the Classic sets.  But that's just a guess.

Number of this card in my collection: 6
2014 update: 7 
2015 update: 9
2016 update: n/a
2017 update: 11
2018 update: 14
2019 update: 20
2020 update: n/a
2021 update: n/a
2022 update: 25
2023 update: 27
2024 update: 28
2025 update: 29
2026 update: 34




Tuesday, October 16, 2012

1991 Panini Canadian Top 15




















Card Review: 5.3  These are just a bit smaller thank a regular card.  I guess that Panini Sticker books in Canada had a set of 15 players, presumably all Expos and Blue Jays.  I could be way off, it's just a guess.

Number of this card in my collection: 3
2013 update: 4
2014 update: n/a
2015 update: n/a
2016 update: 5
2017 update: n/a
2018 update: 22
2019 update: 24

Thursday, October 11, 2012

1991 Panini #64


















Card Review: 6.5  This is probably my favorite Panini set that they ever put out.  It's also the only one I ever actually made an effort to complete the book for  (These stickers were sold in packs, and there was a "book" bought separately with team pages for them the stickers to be stuck on).  For reason all the kids on my block decided to work on this set, and we ended up trading a lot of these for a summer.

Panini also offered a program where you could send them your doubles (like up to 5) and request other stickers in return.  I know they limited the number of the same sticker you could ask for (2 or 3), but I know I maxed out my Wallach request.  My book, which I think I completed, has not survived.

Number of this "card" in my collection: 5
2013 update: n/a
2014 update: n/a
2015 update: n/a
2016 update: n/a
2017 update: n/a
2018 update: n/a
2019 update: 6
2020 update: n/a
2021 update: n/a
2022 update: n/a
2023 update: 8



Saturday, August 25, 2012

1991 Post #2

















Card Review:  8.8  This card is one that eluded me for a very long time.  I actually acquired an uncut sheet of this card before the actual card.  Once in hand, it's very a nice card, at least as far as cards from cereal boxes go.  I like all the red, and there's a decent attempt at putting stats on the back.  I've often seen this listed as "Post Canadian," which makes sense due to the French.  I'm guessing the player selection was different in Canada than it was in the United States.  I know my brother and I ate obscene amounts of Post raisin bran chasing these things, and we never pulled a Wallach (I don't recall even thinking he was in the set).  It stands out in my memory because we preferred Kellog's Raisin Bran (well, actually my brother and I preferred Frosted Flakes and Captain Crunch, but that didn't happen on school mornings, or any mornings at all for that matter in my house).  But when Post had baseball cards, we suffered through it.

Number of this card in my collection: 1
2012 update: 3
2014 update: 5
2015 update: 8
2016 update: 11
2017 update: n/a
2018 update: 14
2019 update: n/a
2020 update: 15
2021 update: n/a
2022 update: 16
2023 update: 17


Wednesday, June 20, 2012

1991 Classic #2

















Card Review: 8.9  This card wasn't really on my radar as far as knowing it even existed until it showed up in a random lot of Wallach's I bought on ebay.  That kind of thing used to happen quite a bit back around 1999, when ebay (and pretty much the internet too) was new.  I spent a lot of time buying postal money orders because paypal didn't exists back in those years.  The card design is rather weak, complete with the stupid box for an "autographs" on the back.  I would argue it's to fill space for a company too lazy to print career stats.  But the photo is above average, and the purple, if nothing else, is at least different. 

Fun Facts: *This is the lowest card number of any Wallach in my collection

Number of this card in my collection: 1

2012 update: 2
2014 update: 3
2015 update: n/a
2016 update: 5
2017 update: n/a
2018 update: n/a
2019 update: n/a
2020 update: 6
2021 update: n/a
2022 update: n/a
2023 update: n/a
2024 update: 7
2025 update: 9
2026 update: 10





Wednesday, May 2, 2012

1991 O-Pee-Chee #220











 








Card Review: 9.0  I would have loved to see the 40th logo in the upper left done as an O-Pee-Chee logo, maybe with a different number.  I don't know what year OPC started putting out sets.  As it is, it just looks like a Topps Tiffany, it actually looks more like a typical tiffany than the '91 Tiffany does.

Number of this card in my collection: 1
2013 update: 2
2015 update: 3
2016 update: n/a
2017 update: n/a
2018 update: n/a
2019 update: n/a
2020 update: n/a
2021 update: n/a
2022 update: 4

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

1991 Fleer #251





















Card Review: 9.3  I've always liked the '91 Fleer design.  I know a lot of people find the yellow to be too loud, but it's never bothered me.  I bought a ton of these looking for the "Pro-Visions" set.  Which was basically just a knockoff of the Upper Deck checklist.  I'm usually not wild about cards with pictures of fielding, but this one is actually pretty good.

Number of this card in my collection: 30

2012 update: 36
2013 update: 64
2014 update: 80
2015 update: 126
2016 update: 153
2017 update: 163
2018 update: 184
2019 update: 203
2020 update: 210
2021 update: 223
2022 update: 244
2023 update: 296
2024 update: 318
2025 update: 322
2026 update: 324




Sunday, April 29, 2012

1991 Score #210











 




Card Review: 8.0  The first few score designs all had really nice backs.  The front of this card leaves a lot to be desired.  Besides the fact that it's a little too similar to the '88 Score design for my taste, the imagery just doesn't work well.  I don't like photos taken on rainy days, and the green border doesn't mesh with the blue uniforms.

Number of this card in my collection: 53
2012 update: 68
2013 update: 89
2014 update: 119
2015 update: 165 
2016 update: 195
2017 update: 217
2018 update: 227
2019 update: 265
2020 update: 271
2021 update: 274
2022 update: 348
2023 update: 387
2024 update: 412
2025 update: 421
2026 update: 426






Saturday, April 28, 2012

1991 Denny's #12






















Card Review: 3.5 I remember these being a very big deal at the time.  There was no Denny's in Cooperstown, so I didn't come across this until years later on ebay.  By then the excitement was long gone.

Fun Facts: *Wallach's 3rd grand slam came off of Nolan Ryan.

Number of this card in my collection: 1
2012 update: 5
2013 update: 7
2014 update: 11
2015 update: 15
2016 update: n/a
2017 update: n/a
2018 update: 16
2019 update: 18
2020 update: n/a
2021 update: n/a
2022 update: 21
2023 update: 22
2024 update: 23
2025 update: 24




Saturday, March 10, 2012

1991 Donruss #406 (MVP)




















Card Review: 9.6  What's not to love about this card?  After nearly decade of being snubbed for Diamond Kings, and four years of being passed over for "MVP" by Donruss, they finally got it right.  My burning question is, why didn't Donruss run with this back on their base cards as well?  It's a lot nicer than their standard back, which was universally hated by all.
Fun Facts: *1991 was the first year Donruss put out cards as two different series.  Wallach had two cards in series 2, essentially making my odds 4x as likely of pulling a Wallach from a pack of '91 Donruss series 2, than it had been in all other years.

Number of this card in my collection: 38

2012 update: 45
2013 update: 81
2014 update: 99
2015 update: 136
2016 update: 177
2017 update: 207
2018 update: 246
2019 update: 295
2020 update: 300
2021 update: 303
2022 update: 396
2023 update: 405
2024 update: 436
2025 update: 443
2026 update: 446





Friday, March 9, 2012

1991 Topps Tiffany #220





















Card Review: 8.9  I don't know if it's just this card, or if they're all like this, but I find the coloring a bit weird on the front.  It seems less "Tiffany" and more "sun bleached" to me.  There's no shortage of 1991 Topps variations out there and this one doesn't really distinguish itself one way or the other.  I've never been too wild about this card, though I've always like the '91 design.

*Update* It believed that there were 4,000 sets produced for this product


Number of this card in my collection: 1

2012 update: 2
2013 update: n/a
2014 update: n/a
2015 update: n/a
2016 update: n/a
2017 update: n/a
2018 update: n/a
2019 update: 3
2020 update: n/a
2021 update: n/a
2022 update: n/a
2023 update: 4