Showing posts with label Sunday Edition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sunday Edition. Show all posts

Sunday, June 21, 2026

Bulletin Board Material



Bulletin Board Material

The above is a photo of the bulletin board in my office.  For years I've wanted to pin a Topps card from every year since '52 to it, but have only now finally gotten around to it.  I'm pleased with the way it came out.  My basic idea beyond one of every year, was to not have any duplicate players and keep it all to one team.  I thought about doing a card from the corresponding World Series Champion for each season, but in the end opted for keeping it all one team.  I feel like this is a better example of the changes (and similarities) in design from year to year.  I was able to pull duplicates from my collection (no breaking up sets in 3-ring binders) for most of these.  1997 through 2007 did require going on Sportlots and hunting down cards as I literally have zero cards from a lot of those seasons, but that was surprisingly painless as far as cost.  Here's a run down of who made the board.


1952 to 1955

I didn't have a lot to go with as far as duplicates from these sets.  Ed Lopat is the only big name here (check his stats, I bet you'll be surprised).  The Frank Overmire is a card I've always thought was nice looking, and ended up picking up a few of them whenever I saw them for cheap when I was building the '52 set as a result.  It may not be apparent, but I didn't actually stick the cards with the push pins.  Sure, they'll have little dents along the edge, but I'm no slabber, they'll be fine.


1956 to 1959

You can really see the thought process Topps was using in the 50's with these cards.  '58 is basically a rehash of '54, but with just the mini picture.  '59 combines '57 and '58.  It wasn't until I started focusing my collecting on vintage Topps sets, that I suddenly saw just how prominent bright colors have been to the design throughout the years.  For decades I viewed sets like '54, '58, and '75 as outliers, but with only a few exceptions, it's almost always in the design.


1960 to 1963

It took me forty years of looking at these cards to see the common thread in '60, '61, and '63, with the red and yellow at the bottom.  Now I can't unsee it.  The names on these cards should start being more recognizable.  The '63 Yogi is probably the biggest card on the board, certainly if condition wasn't a factor it would be.  This might also be my favorite four year run of Topps cards that they've ever printed.  This run represents the heart of my father's collection that survived.  As kids (around '88) my brother and I would go through his shoe box of cards and just be in awe of these.  They somehow seemed older forty years ago than they do today.  None of these were my father's cards.  As I've dove head first into vintage collecting, I've never intermingled the ones I pick up with his originals, which are somehow now far out numbered by mine.


1964 to 1967

This run of four years has never really caught my attention.  I am seeing it with some new eyes, and '64 & 67 do suddenly have a lot more pop of color I didn't always see and ''66 keeps with the red/yellow bottom stripping, so there is some new found appreciation.  Howard/Pepitone/Bouton/Ford also represent four of my all-time favorite Yankees, albeit for very different reasons.


1968 to 1972

I somehow never matched the red bubbles (at least, red in the case of Yankees, various other colors for other teams) in the lower left of '68 with the red bubbles in the uppe right of '69.  I also somehow never noticed "Yanks" as the name in the '70 set, and that was a set I spent a ton of time analyzing as it was the first vintage set build I ever completed.  Outside of Tresh, these guys may not be household names, but they all had very solid careers and deserve to be represented up here on this board as great Yankees of their era (albeit, not all Yankees Era's are created equal).


1973 to 1977

This is a great run of designs.  I don't argue with people who say '75 is the best set Topps ever printed (not my choice, but it's on my short list), and the other ones up here are all great as well.  When you focus on the pops of color on these other four designs, they suddenly look a lot less drab.  The red circle on '73, the blue piping on '74, '76 with the stripes, and '77 with the team names and pennant.  I also really like the players I was able to use for this run.  The Sparkly Lyle is a card that never really caught my eye during my '74 set build, but definitely should have.


1978 to 1981

This isn't my favorite four year run of designs, but there absolutley nothing wrong with them either, as evidenced by these four cards.  I think Topps was really in a groove here and would keep it going for another ten years before they started to over think things.  The Munson, Guidry, and Jackson may be four of my favorite Topps cards in existence, just fantastic examples of what a "baseball card" is supposed to be.


1982 to 1986

With this run of cards we've run into my era of collecting.  I know I bought cards in '83, but '84 was the first set I actually remember asking for in the grocery store (and even then it was usually Fleer at the time).  By '86 I was full on trading cards with friends.  That '86 Mattingly is one of the first cards I remember being "special" and standing out among the others.  Prior to that I think my focus was on Expos and cards with "cool" photos on the front.


1987 to 1991

This five year run perfectly captures the heart of my collecting.  I bought more packs of cards during this period than any other period.  These sets will always elicit happy memories for me.  They may not be worth the cardboard they're printed on to modern collectors, but to me they're priceless.  I may also be the only person in the world who holds this position, but you'll never convince me that 1988 Topps isn't the greatest set ever printed.  Just a perfectly executed and genuine throwback to the sets that came before it, with obvious elements of '64, '66, and '67.  Maybe Topps was feeling nostalgic heading into their 40th, because all of these designs borrow heavily from ones that came before (something I wish Topps would do more of today).

1992 to 1995

Thanks a lot Upper Deck, and misguided kids who bought it (my brother and I bought a crazy amount of Upper Deck from '89-'91).  This is the start of Topps messing with the program that had worked perfectly well for forty years, wasn't broken, and didn't need to be fixed.  1992 saw the white backs with color photos of the stadiums, '93 introduced gloss to the backs, and for some reason Topps decided their bubble gum cards required foil stamping in 1995 and have never looked back.  By 1995 I wasn't really buying cards any more.  I would pick up a few packs every year until '97, just to see the designs, but I had moved on to other interest for the most part.


1996 to 2000

I have deep seeded resentment towards the 1996 and 1997 Topps sets.  I actually kind of like the '97 design (a lot if I'm being honest), but these two sets still earn my disdain.  The problem being one of omission.  There is no Tim Wallach in either sets unusually small checklists.  There definitely should be based on precedent, but there isn't.  Other companies at the time were still including Wallach, but for some reason Topps didn't think he warranted inclusion with his 2000 hits and 17 years worth of stats to fill up the backs with.  I don't know what Topps was thinking at the time, and I wasn't buying cards, but I find this to be a rather forgettable period in the Topps timeline.


2001 to 2005

I definitely never bought a single pack from any one of these sets.  They're not bad looking sets.  I like the return of the second photo in 2003, and I find the 2002 bronze border to a subtle ode to '87 and '62 (even if no one else does).  2004 and 2005 would be so much better looking if the names at the top were just matte colors instead of hard to read foil stamping.


2006 to 2009

2008 represents my return to card collecting.  It was just supposed to be something to break the monotony of studing for the bar exam, but now 18 years later I'm still as deep as I ever was into the hobby.  Or at least, my 1988 version of the hobby that doesn't involve slabs or willie wonka golden ticket cards.  This is a nice little run of big name Yankees, maybe the best four year run on my board.


2010 -2014

I didn't like these sets much when they came out, and they haven't grown on me any since then.  Too much white, too much foil, not enough personality.


2015 to 2019

I appreciate Topps making an effort to take some design risk during this run of sets.  They don't all hit (2016 I find particularly terrible), but a few of them do and I'd much prefer Topps take a risk that doesn't work out with a design, then pump out another generic boring set.


2020 to 2023

2023 has really grown on me as a set.  I actually think it's the start of a nice little run that Topps has carried into 2026.  2020 on the other hand may be my least favorite design on this board.  I think Luke Voit, the most anonomous Yankee to ever lead the American League in home runs, is an apt choice to represent the set.


2024 to 2026

2024 is in my opinion, the best Topps design of the last 15 years.  2025 and 2026 are fine as well.  I think were due for a colorful set in 2027, but Topps may have other ideas.  In any event, I've got room for seven more sets before I run out of space.  This whole exercise has made me feel very old.











Tuesday, January 21, 2025

2024 Topps Set Review




2024 Topps Set Review

I finally  picked up a 2024 Topps set.  Once again this year I opted not to try to build the set by way of purchasing packs and for the same reasons.  It would have cost me probably close to a grand to do so and that's assuming I was even able to find packs to over pay for (I'm not sure I ever saw Series 2 on shelves).

So instead, for the rather reasonable price of $47 shipped on ebay, I picked up a factory set.  I'd be lying if I said I didn't miss doing this the old fashioned way, especially in year where I really like the design, such as this one, but I'm not made of money either.  So let's dive in.


These factory sets now come in an endless variation of boxes.  I'm not sure how many, what they all mean, or what the various gimmicks inside are, and I don't really care.  So long as they include all 700 cards as this one did, that's good enough for me.  This particular one came with a cello-pack of five rookies with photo variations and as I discovered once I started sorting the cards inside, four additional rookie cards numbered 697 to 700, so each of those numbers have two players sharing a card number.  Those four rookies and the ones in the package have a different designation in the upper left on the back marking them as cards that are not part of the actual set and as just goofy extras.  Fine.  I'll take free cards, they're essentially really nice cereal box card giveaways.


 Once again this year, like every other year I believe, the cards inside were not in numerical order.  I have a system down for sorting to the point of it being muscle memory so I was able to get them in sequence fairly quickly and at this point I actually enjoy it.


Now as to the cards themselves, here some thoughts, cards I like, players I like, complaints and just general musings:

 

#300 Emanual Valdez, it's a great looking card.  Nice job Topps.  However, why is a guy with 139 career at-bats getting card #300?  These historically have been reseved for the biggest stars in the game.  I'd like to see Topps going back to reserving every card number ending in "0" for a star player, but that would require time, effort, and maybe even an appreciation for baseball cards and the people who collect them.  And it's not like they can say they don't worry about numbering anymore and it's all random, such as this next one:

 

#99 Aaron Judge, someone at Topps is willing to take 30 seconds and make sure the absolute biggest star or two get the special numbering.  They're just not willing to take 30 minutes and count off 60 or 70 stars, that may require an actual knowledge of baseball.

Something Topps still gets right, and to their endless credit, gets right year after year, is the full career stats on the back of cards.  Below are series of veterans that really highlight just how nice a feature the full stats on the back is:

 
                      








Topps, also to their credit, continues to produce nice cards for players who aren't on their way to Cooperstown (maybe a few guys below could be, but you get my point).  Here's a look at some cards that caught my eye as nice ones in the set:












 

  


The over the wall (or at least against the wall) catch has been a favorite since at least the 1989 Upper Deck Eric Young.  Maybe there were earlier examples, but that's the first one I remember going crazy for.  Here is Luis Robert getting the treatment from Topps with a great looking card:


Great as that card is, and the general idea of that card is, I think you can have too much of a good thing.  I'm not sure what exactly the number is to cross that that line, but Topps crossed it this year.  In fact, they crossed it by such a wide margin it made me long for some old staples of Topps sets that I haven't seen in awhile.  Like whatever happened to that standard yearbook style photo?  Think 1985 Gooden or 1961 Willie Mays, I actually wouldn't mind a few cards like that mixed into a set.  Not to mention photos from guys in the dugout or standing around the batting cage.  Those used to be staples.  Not as exciting as these cards below, but again, I think you can have too much of a good thing.




I give Topps pretty high marks for how they handled the standard subsets this year.  My complaints, to the extent that I have any, are complaints of ommission.  I'd like to see manager cards again, checklist, and themed All-Star cards similar to what they did from around '82-'93.  I also wouldn't mind Record Breakers and Throw Back the Clock cards making a comeback, but I don't feel as strongly about that.

 

I like the team cards.  They're more or less standard fare, but Topps clearly puts some effort into the photo selection.  My only note is I'd rather Topps printed actual checklist cards and gave us Team Leaders on the backs of these, or some other statistic.  It could be hot dogs and beers sold during the season, anything really.

 

I love "Future Stars," especially "Future Stars" with the '87 style rainbow font.  No Notes.  Same for the Rookie Cup cards like the one below.  Topps does a great job not trying to fix something that isn't broken.

 




I like these League Leaders.  Would I really like to see the tiny heads from the 60's make a comeback?  Of course, but these work fine too.  As for the MLB cards like the one below, they remind me more of 1980's Fleer than traditional Topps, but Topps also has a history of cards like this going back to '54.  I kind of like them, but like the team cards, I wish it wasn't also serving as a checklist, which I think should be a stand alone card.


The Rookie Variants: I wasn't sure if I was going to include these as I don't consider them part of the set.  But if I didn't include them, I wouldn't have anywhere to complain about all the things I don't like about them.  Below is the De La Cruz rookie.  The "real" one, as in the one you would need to obtain if you were trying to build the set (something collector's have been doing with Topps offerings for over 75 years now) is the one on the right with Elly batting.  The one on the left is, well I don't really know what it is.  It's a "variation" or "alternate photo."  Below the card number on the back, Topps clearly identifies it as not being part of the actual set.  I guess they're just a stunt for player collectors?  I find them just to be annoying.  How is a guy going to have an iconic Topps rookie card if there are multiple photos?  We lose something with these.  I say '84 Mattingly, or '75 Yount, and we can all instantly see cards.  That won't be the case for these cards in another five years, let alone 40 or 50.

Wierder still, a couple of these guys aren't even in the regular set.  How do classify that?  I came of age with the "XRC" in Traded sets, but at least those were to some extent recognized as real sets.  Asking collector's to obtain extra cards that can only be acquired 3 or so at a time by way of buying a factory set just strikes me as absurd.  

In any event, I make my peace with the basic 700 card set and don't sleep on not having all the duplicate numbered variant cards.  I also don't feel I gain anything special by having them.  They're just sort of,...there.



  


  


  


 



All in all, this is my favorite set since 2018, and in the running as my favorite design since I started collecting again back in 2008.  I love the hints of 1986 in it, and hope Topps continues to do call backs to older sets (my first impression of 2025 is it looks like 1982).  I prefer they take chances, even if they miss, its better than an endless parade of all white bordered blandness.

Thanks for reading.