Monday, May 28, 2012

1984 Topps (Encased Variant) "Test Design"




















Card Review: 4.5  I paid $9.49 for this stupid thing.  The most I've ever paid for a single Wallach.  Allegedly this was a "Test Design" that Topps produced.  On the final design, the players head in the lower right, protrudes from the box.  There are some zoomed in close ups below.  Nothing I'm going to get too excited about.

Number of this card in my collection: 1





This is copy and pasted from the ebay listing, I have no idea as to it's validity.  Frankly I think the guy sounds a little pompous and it saddened my to send him my money for this card.

ABOUT THE 1984 TOPPS ENCASED VARIATIONS
AS DESIGN TEST ISSUE CARDS

An extremely rare but popular card issue produced during the 1980's is the 1984 Topps Encased Variation baseball cards.   A complete basic set of 1984 Topps Encased Variations consists of 66 different skip-numbered cards.  The 1984 Encased Variation cards are obviously DESIGN TEST ISSUES.  That is, the 84T Encased Variations are cards having designs different from the common normally printed baseball cards of that year, reflecting a testing by the card manufacturer of design features not used for the regular pack-distributed cards of that year.  In fact, all of the known 84T Encased Variations apparently originate from sheets issued or discarded by Topps and/or from individual cards cut years later from the original DESIGN TEST ISSUE SHEETS and sold through The Topps Vault.

No matter what some "experts" may proclaim otherwise, the 1984 Topps Encased Variations are DESIGN TEST ISSUE cards and NOT proof cards.  That is, the 1984 Topps Encased Variation cards with four-color process printed fronts and blank standard Topps gray stock backs are NOT proofs!  But these are DESIGN TEST ISSUE cards. 

A true proof card is one that comes from a sheet created for the printer to examine for ink flow checking and for determinations of problems needing correction before the massive print run of cards is given the okay to proceed.  Such proofs often are with only one, two or three of the four process ink colors present on the front.  Another form of true proof card is called a "make-ready" proof, a card from a sheet created during the operating of the presses to get the ink colors properly flowing as a sort of "warm up" before the sheets for the normally printed cards to be marketed to the public are printed.  "Make ready" proofs often have unusual ink color densities and combinations and are typically discarded as "waste" and only very rarely ever become available to the public.  The 1984 Topps Encased Variations obviously do not qualify as proofs created for the printer to examine nor as "make ready" proofs.  Therefore, the 84T Encased Variation cards are NOT proofs:  these are cards created by the card manufacturer to see or test what a new or differently designed card style will look like — that is, as DESIGN TEST ISSUE cards.  

The key design difference between the 1984 Topps Encased Variations and the common regular Topps baseball cards issued in 1984 is that on the front of an Encased Variation the head portrait of the player is COMPLETELY ENCASED within the black border forming the portrait box while in the common regular Topps card the head portrait of the player extends onto and/or above the top black border of the portrait box.  The completely encased within the portrait box feature of the 1984 Topps Encased Variations has resulted in these cards sometimes being called "Head-In-Box" cards.  Also the 1984 Topps Encased Variations are always blank-backed while the common regular Topps cards usually have printed backs.  

As is detailed above, the 1984 Topps Encased Variations are clearly DESIGN TEST ISSUE cards, NOT proof cards.  However, adding to the confusion is that both Sports Collectors Digest and Beckett in their huge encyclopedic catalogs mistakenly list the 84T Encased Variations as "proofs" and not as Design Test Issues nor as variations!  In a PSA article published on the collection of major card collector Bob Fisk, these 1984 Topps are pointed out as being among the most notable and rare cards in Fisk's collection.  At least PSA correctly identified these as Encased Variations but added the mistake of also calling these "proofs"!

What does make things a bit complicated is that there are "proof" versions known for the 1984 Topps Encased Variation cards.  Proof versions of the 1984 Topps Encased Variations exist and are ultra, ultra rare — with the 84T Encased Variation proofs having only one or two of four process ink colors on the front.  The 84T Encased Variation proof cards were released to the public via The Topps Vault.  

Saturday, May 26, 2012

1988 Fleer Star Stickers #98




















Card Review: 9.1  I've always like this card.  The back in particular.  This is another random '88 set that I know little to nothing about.  This is card #98, so it was likely too big to be sold in deck-of-cards style box package the way Revco and K-Mart used to do.  But that's just a guess.  It may well have been sold in packs.

Number of this card in my collection: 3

Friday, May 25, 2012

1988 Panini #327




















Card Review: 2.3  They don't get much more vanilla than this.  The '88 Panini stickers are little larger than most years.  The photo's are lot duller.  Granted, I've only seen this one, maybe some are action shots.

Number of this card in my collection: 6

Thursday, May 24, 2012

1988 Fleer Mini #91




















Card Review: 3.5  I don't remember ever seeing these Fleer mini's in 1988.  There was so many junk sets put out then it was hard to keep track.  I have no idea how large the set was or how it was sold.  All in all, it's a very underwhelming card.  Though I like the photo selection a little better than the base card, but no where near as much as the box bottom.  I'd guess that all three photo's are from the same at-bat.

Number of this card in my collection: 1

Friday, May 11, 2012

1987 Indiana Blue Sox #27


















Card Review: 4.4  I don't know much about this set.  There was/(is?) a card shop in the Double Day parking lot that was owned by my 8th card latin teacher, Mr. Henrici, and it had tons of them. They were marked about a buck a peice, at least the Wallach's were and it was years before I finally coughed up the dollar to buy one.  That was a lot for a Wallach, much less a clearly generic Wallach.  Mr. Henrici was the teacher/owner.  He allegedly played college ball at Georgetown.  He didn't think much of me as an 8th grader, but when I started putting balls out of Doubleday in high school he was suddenly a lot nicer.  Who says sports can't help your grades in Latin?

Number of this card in my collection: 1

Thursday, May 10, 2012

1988 Topps Glossy Send-In #18




















Card Review: 4.3  I never liked these.  They used to come one to a rack pack, or there was some way to send in for the whole set.  I may have done that once or twice.  They just look lazy.

Number of this card in my collection: 1

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

1988 Topps Super Star #9




















Card Review: 6.5  These were the backs of the Topps Stickers from '88.  Most had two stickers on the reverse.  This one just had a foil Darryl Strawberry.  I believe there was a special page in the sticker book for the foil ones, or there was one per team page.  These were done in the style of the Topps All-Star cards of the 1980's with NL being blue and AL red.

Number of this card in my collection: 3

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

1989 Panini #122




















Card Review: 4.5 Not really a card, but I'm not complaining.  I used to like these sticker books.  These are little larger than normal for Panini stickers, and the focus isn't very sharp.  Then again, it could just be this one as I don't have any to compare it to.

Number of this card in my collection: 1

Friday, May 4, 2012

1990 Donruss Baseball's Best #55




















Card Review: 8.8  I like these blue variants of the red '90 Donruss design.  It's too bad they didn't do something similar in '89.

Number of this card in my collection: 1

Thursday, May 3, 2012

1990 U.S. Playing Cards #5D




















Card Review: 5.0  Nothing really wrong with this.  It's a playing card.  I'd like to have the whole deck.  I don't.  Just this one.  Not sure how Wallach didn't end up an Ace or at least on a face card.

Number of this card in my collection: 2

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

1991 O-Pee-Chee #220














Card Review: 9.0  I would have loved to see the 40th logo in the upper left done as an O-Pee-Chee logo, maybe with a different number.  I don't know what year OPC started putting out sets.  As it is, it just looks like a Topps Tiffany, it actually looks more like a typical tiffany than the '91 Tiffany does.

Number of this card in my collection: 1

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

1991 Fleer #251




















Card Review: 9.6  I've always liked the '91 Fleer design.  I know a lot of people find the yellow to be too loud, but it's never bothered me.  I bought a ton of these looking for the "Pro-Visions" set.  Which was basically just a knockoff of the Upper Deck checklist.  I'm usually not wild about cards with pictures of fielding, but this one is actually pretty good.

Number of this card in my collection: 30

Sunday, April 29, 2012

1991 Score #210




















Card Review: 8.0  The first few score designs all had really nice backs.  The front of this card leaves a lot to be desired.  I don't like photos taken on rainy days, and the green border doesn't mesh with the blue uniforms.

Number of this card in my collection: 53

Saturday, April 28, 2012

1991 Denny's #12




















Card Review: 3.5 I remember these being a very big deal at the time.  There was no Denny's in Cooperstown, so I didn't come across this until years later on ebay.  By then the excitement was long gone.

Fun Facts: *Wallach's 3rd grand slam came off of Nolan Ryan.

Number of this card in my collection: 1

Friday, April 27, 2012

1992 Studio #60




















Card Review: 7.1 As far as Studio cards go, this one is pretty good.  I mean, it's still a stupid set and a bad idea, '92 just isn't as awful as some of the other sets Studio put out.

Number of this card in my collection: 3

Thursday, April 26, 2012

1992 Panini #204




















"Card" Review: 6.5  I actually really like the photo on this sticker.  The back is about what'd you expect from a sticker.  I'm little annoyed that Wallach's back is a strikeout, but I'm just assuming it's random.

Number of this "card" in my collection: 5

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

1993 Fleer Ultra #408









Card Review: 9.1  I liked the '93 Ultra design.  For the most part it's identical to the '92 design, except the fake marble is brown instead of green.

Number of this card in my collection: 3

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

1993 Bowman #70
















Card Review: 6.8  The back of this card is a lot nicer than the front.  All in all not a horrible looking card, but a major step back from the nice '92 Bowman design.

Number of this card in my collection: 6

Monday, April 23, 2012

1994 Studio #73




















Card Review:  1.5  Studio was a rather regretable set that Donruss put out for a few years.  This one however is kind of funny.  Take a look at the zoomed in picture of the card below.  That appears to be a Topps vending box in Wallach's locker.  Nice work Donruss.


Number of this card in my collection: 5

Saturday, April 21, 2012

1994 Triple Play #90
















Card Review: 9.1  I like this '94 Triple Play design.  What I like even more is that Wallach was given his own card in '94 after being relegated to a card with two other new acquisitions by the Dodgers in the '93 Triple Play set.  Full career stats are always welcome on the back of a card.

Number of this card in my collection: 6

Thursday, April 19, 2012

1994 LAPD D.A.R.E. #29




















Card Review: 0.4  This "card" has stock so thin it barely qualifies as a card.  It's slightly thicker than the cover of a magazine. I've heard these were given out to kids by the LAPD.  Instead they ended up on the secondary market.  Wonder what the school kids did with the money they got for selling them.

Number of this card in my collection: 2

Sunday, April 15, 2012

1995 Stadium Club #259

















Card Review: 8.8  You have to wonder what Wallach was thinking while the Topps photographer made him pose for this card.  Also, where exactly was this picture taken?  Are those pine trees in the outfield?  I guess it's kind of cool.  As for the back, well, it sucks.

Number of this card in my collection: 5

Saturday, April 14, 2012

1995 Collector's Choice SE #94 Silver Signature




















Card Review: 9.1 I'm sure I like this any better or worse than the blue base card.  These came one to a pack.

Number of this card in my collection: 1

Friday, April 13, 2012

1995 Leaf Limited #140
















Card Review: 0.8  I guess people actually bought these back in '95, but idiots would buy anything back then.  To me it looks like something that should come with a box of cereal.

Number of this card in my collection: 1